* Kyotaro HORIGUCHI (horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp) wrote:
> I suppose it is for suggesting what kind of word should come
> there, or avoiding silence for a tab. Or for symmetry with other
> types of manipulation, like DROP. Another possibility is creating
> multiple objects with similar names, say CREATE TABLE
> employee_x1, CREATE TABLE employee_x2. Just trying to complete
> existing *schema* is one more another possible objective.
I don't buy any of these arguments either. I *really* don't want us
going down some road where we try to make sure that hitting 'tab' never
fails...
Thanks!
Stephen
