Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck
Date
Msg-id 20170215233250.zqwmovwl36nlxqsj@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-02-15 18:30:30 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> If we tried to lock that down it'd be counterproductive for the reason
> Andres mentions: sometimes you *want* to see what you get for other
> settings.

We could kinda address that by doing it in a separate file early in the
schedule, which could just be commented out when doing something like
this.  But I'm still unconvinced it's worth caring.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] bytea_output vs make installcheck
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Logical replication existing data copy