Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
Date
Msg-id 20170214023639.pkk542hwk2e7gqbt@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-02-13 20:59:43 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
> 
> 2017-02-13 6:46 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>:
> 
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > here is new update - check is done before any creating
> >
> > It may be better to do any checks before dropping existing databases
> > as well... It would be as well just simpler to complain with a single
> > error message like "database and template list lengths do not match".
> >
> 
> next step

I still fail to see why --use-existing as suggested in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170208002900.vkldujzfkwbvqqq7@alap3.anarazel.de
isn't sufficient.

- Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress