On 2017-02-09 19:19:21 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > > Also, our experience with contrib/tsearch2 suggests that the extension
> > > shouldn't be part of contrib, because we have zero track record of getting
> > > rid of stuff in contrib, no matter how dead it is.
> >
> > Let's nuke tsearch2 to remove this adverse precedent, and then add the
> > new thing.
> >
> > Anybody who still wants tsearch2 can go get it from an old version, or
> > somebody can maintain a fork on github.
>
> Works for me.
+1
> I'd love to nuke pg_shadow and all the other
> not-really-maintained backwards-compat things from when roles were
> added too.
Not sure if it's worth the work to rip out and such, but I'm mildly
supportive of this one too. Depends a bit on what all the other things
are ;)
Andres
