All,
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> >> Hmm. There's an argument to be made that ALTER EXTENSION ADD should
> >> absorb whatever the object's current ACLs are into the pg_init_privs
> >> entries for the extension. (I don't think it does that now, though
> >> I might be wrong.) However ...
>
> > I've not gone and looked yet, but I doubt that it does. I think I can
> > agree with the argument that it really should add those ACLs to
> > pg_init_privs. Of course, any furhter manipulation of the ACLs from
> > that point will cause those ACLs to be included in the pg_dump.
>
> > I'll take a look at ALTER EXTENSION ADD and pg_init_privs.
>
> By the same token, does ALTER EXTENSION DROP remove those entries?
I've pushed a fix for this and back-patched it to 9.6.
Thanks!
Stephen
