Re: [HACKERS] COPY as a set returning function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: [HACKERS] COPY as a set returning function
Date
Msg-id 20170128010747.GB26422@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] COPY as a set returning function  (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] COPY as a set returning function  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:51:38PM -0500, Corey Huinker wrote:
> I've put in some more work on this patch, mostly just taking Alvaro's
> suggestions, which resulted in big code savings.

The patch applies atop master.

The test (ls) which previously crashed the backend now doesn't, and
works in a reasonable way.

The description of the function still talks about its being a proof of
concept.

There are still neither regression tests nor SGML documentation.

Are we at a point where we should add these things?

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash