Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > It is really quite annoying that the buildfarm doesn't do what stock
> > tests do. What about pushing a bit stronger for having these
> > optimizations as part of the standard build run, instead of being only
> > in the buildfarm client script?
>
> Huh? It's just a question of "make check" vs "make installcheck".
> They each have their uses.
The current problem is because the buildfarm uses a different database.
See https://postgr.es/m/e6084b89-07a7-7e57-51ee-d7b8fc9ec864@2ndQuadrant.com
(When I wrote the para quoted above, I thought this was for performance,
but now I realize it's not so. Anyway the point stands that buildfarm
does things differently.)
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
