Re: Better error messages for %TYPE and %ROWTYPE in plpgsql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Better error messages for %TYPE and %ROWTYPE in plpgsql
Date
Msg-id 2016194.1708997244@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Better error messages for %TYPE and %ROWTYPE in plpgsql  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 5:46 PM Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213@163.com> wrote:
>> Looks this modify the error message,

Well, yeah, that's sort of the point.

>> I want to know how ould we treat
>> error-message-compatible issue during minor / major upgrade.

> There is no bug here so no back-patch; and we are not yet past feature
> freeze for v17.

Indeed, I did not intend this for back-patch.  However, I'm having
a hard time seeing the errors in question as something you'd have
automated handling for, so I don't grasp why you would think
there's a compatibility hazard.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Sequence Access Methods, round two
Next
From: Xing Guo
Date:
Subject: Re: Control your disk usage in PG: Introduction to Disk Quota Extension