As I mentioned above [1] in my humble opinion this patch is not at all in a
"good shape" until it breaks existing extensions.
[1] http://postgr.es/m/20161115080324.GA5351%40e733.localdomain
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 10:49:30PM +0700, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
> > On 5 December 2016 at 12:03, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > > Moved to next CF with "needs review" status.
>
> Looks like we stuck here little bit. Does anyone else have any
> suggestions/improvements, or this patch is in good enough shape?
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev