Re: [GENERAL] huge table occupation after updates - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andreas Kretschmer
Subject Re: [GENERAL] huge table occupation after updates
Date
Msg-id 20161210123636.GA10052@tux
Whole thread Raw
In response to [GENERAL] huge table occupation after updates  (Tom DalPozzo <t.dalpozzo@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tom DalPozzo <t.dalpozzo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I've a table ('stato') with an indexed bigint ('Id') and 5 bytea fields
> ('d0','d1',...,'d4').
> I populated the table with 10000 rows; each d.. field inizialized with 20
> bytes.
> Reported table size is 1.5MB. OK.
> Now, for 1000 times,  I update  2000 different rows each time, changing d0
> filed keeping the same length, and at the end of all,  I issued VACUUM.
> Now table size is 29MB. 
>
> Why so big? What is an upper bound to estimate a table occupation on disk?

every (!) update creates a new row-version and marks the old row as
'old', but don't delete the old row.

A Vacuum marks old rows as reuseable - if there is no runnung
transaction that can see the old row-version. That's how MVCC works in
PostgreSQL.



Regards, Andreas Kretschmer
--
Andreas Kretschmer
http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom DalPozzo
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SELECT slow immediately after many update ordelete+insert, except using WHERE .. IN
Next
From: Francisco Olarte
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] huge table occupation after updates