Re: pg_config --version - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: pg_config --version
Date
Msg-id 20161127202521.GC21874@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_config --version  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 09:12:47AM -0600, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 11/27/16 12:16 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 17:24:36 -0400
> > Make numeric form of PG version number readily available in Makefiles.
> 
> If you don't want to wait for that,

I wonder whether a back-patch to 9.2 with that would be accepted...

> you can use [1] in shell

I'd like to make as few assumptions about build environments as I can.
I know for sure that people are building my things on platforms like
Windows that I have no way to test, but don't wish to break.

> or Make to accomplish something similar. Looks like there is a
> dotted MAJORVERSION variable going back to at least 9.1,

Good to know.  I guess I can rely on there being a GNU make...at least
for now.

> so I could have used that instead of PGVERSION on line 51.
> 1: https://github.com/decibel/pgxntool/blob/master/base.mk#L47-L56

Thanks for sharing :)

Best,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: User-defined Operator Pushdown and Collations
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators