* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 10 November 2016 at 17:12, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Yeah, I think we'd be best off to avoid the bare term "security".
> > It's probably too late to change the RTE field name "securityQuals",
> > but maybe we could uniformly call those "security barrier quals" in
> > the comments. Then the basic terminology is that we have security
> > barrier views and row-level security both implemented on top of
> > security barrier quals, and we should be careful to use the right
> > one of those three terms in comments/documentation.
>
> +1 for that terminology and no renaming of fields.
Agreed.
Thanks!
Stephen
