Re: DROP FUNCTION of multiple functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: DROP FUNCTION of multiple functions
Date
Msg-id 20161101151503.GA29685@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to DROP FUNCTION of multiple functions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: DROP FUNCTION of multiple functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Here is a patch series that implements several changes in the internal
> grammar and node representation of function signatures.  They are not
> necessarily meant to be applied separately, but they explain the
> progression of the changes nicely, so I left them like that for review.

I think patches 1-4 and 6 are pretty clearly straight cleanup and it
seems fine to me to push them ahead of the rest.  I didn't review super
carefully but it looks good on a quick glance.  I'd just advise to pay
special attention to the objectaddress.sql test and the UI involved
there (which you appear to have done already).

Patch 5 is obviously a new feature and I would put that one in a
separate commit from the first four plus six.  (I'm not clear why you
put 6 after 5 instead of before.)

I'm not at all sure about patch 7.  Maybe that one is okay, not sure,
but since it's bigger I didn't look at it.



-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Next
From: Francisco Olarte
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take