Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Jim Nasby wrote:
> >> It occurs to me that it might be worth embedding the relation name in the
> >> free space of the first block. Most people would never notice the missing 64
> >> bytes, but it would be incredibly helpful in cases like this...
>
> > Agreed. The problem is how to install it without breaking pg_upgrade.
>
> Well, that's the first problem. The second problem is how to cope with
> RENAME TABLE.
Uh, sorry. My proposal a couple of years back was to put the
relfilenode, not the name. I didn't notice that it was the name being
proposed here. However, now I notice that this idea doesn't solve the
problem for mapped relations.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
