On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 07:33:56AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > David Steele wrote:
> >> On 10/21/16 3:12 AM, David G. Johnston wrote:
> >>
> >> > I have no problem continuing keeping with historical precedent and
> >> > allowing mnemonic abbreviations in our directory and file names at this
> >> > point.
> >>
> >> I'm still in favor of pg_xact. A search of the 9.6 docs brings up a number
> >> of hits for "xact": pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp(),
> >> pg_advisory_xact_lock(), pg_advisory_xact_lock_shared(),
> >> pg_last_committed_xact(), pg_prepared_xacts(), etc. There are also numerous
> >> column names that have "xact" in them.
> >
> > I'm +1 on pg_clog -> pg_xact.
>
> So let's say that's the winner then.
>
> > Also +1 to renaming pg_subtrans to pg_subxact.
>
> Nice suggestion, good naming for consistency with the rest.
Agreed.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
