Non-empty default log_line_prefix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christoph Berg
Subject Non-empty default log_line_prefix
Date
Msg-id 20161002202039.lhti5rkmikff2aws@msg.df7cb.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Set log_line_prefix and application name in test drivers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: Non-empty default log_line_prefix  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Re: Tom Lane 2016-09-29 <18642.1475159736@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> > Possibly the longer version could be added as an example in the
> > documentation.
>
> I suspect that simply having a nonempty default in the first place
> is going to do more to raise peoples' awareness than anything we
> could do in the documentation.  But perhaps an example along these
> lines would be useful for showing proper use of %q.

Patch attached. (Still using %t, I don't think %m makes sense for the
default.)

Christoph

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgade vs config
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgade vs config