Re: Logical Replication WIP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Logical Replication WIP
Date
Msg-id 20160912195413.vn3puugutaeungag@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Logical Replication WIP  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Logical Replication WIP  (Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-09-12 21:47:08 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On 09/09/16 06:33, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > The start_replication option pg_version option is not documented and
> > not used in any later patch.  We can probably do without it and just
> > rely on the protocol version.
> > 
> 
> That's leftover from binary type data transfer which is not part of this
> initial approach as it adds a lot of complications to both protocol and
> apply side. So yes can do without.

FWIW, I don't think we can leave this out of the initial protocol
design. We don't have to implement it, but it has to be part of the
design.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication WIP
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: inappropriate use of NameGetDatum macro