Re: Tom Lane 2016-08-24 <31168.1472069440@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> In other words, we could make this scenario "work" if we defined
> generate_series as base plus N times the increment, rather than as
> repeated addition of the increment. But I wouldn't be surprised
> if that would break other corner cases (and it would certainly
> be slower). Daylight-savings time is not one of the more consistent
> things in our world ... not that anything at all about the civil
> calendar is mathematically nice :-(.
To avoid DST problems, wouldn't a "date"-based generate_series be the
safe way to go?
Christoph
