On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 03:41:41PM +0000, furlongs@osti.gov wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 14304
> Logged by: Shane Furlong
> Email address: furlongs@osti.gov
> PostgreSQL version: 9.4.9
> Operating system: centOS
> Description:
>
> My shop is running PostgreSQL 9.0 and pg_upgrading to 9.4.
>
> Currently WAL files are saved in a location /pgsql/archive.
>
> New WAL files will be stored in location /pgsql/archive94.
>
> My question is how does pg_upgrade handle WAL files. It looks like to me
> that pg_upgrade only addresses the data directory and not the archive
> directory.
>
> Is it necessary to flush all 9.0 WAL files prior to running pg_upgrade? Or
> would one just copy the WAL files from the previous location to the new
> location?
>
> Any help or direction you can supply would be greatly appreciated.
pg_upgrade does _nothing_ with WAL. It does not copy it from the old
cluster to the new cluster, nor does it interact with the archive
directory.
I do recommend you use a _different_ directory to store the WAL after
the ugprade so the WAL file names don't conflict --- seems you are
already doing that. :-)
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
