On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:41:48AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 08/29/2016 11:39 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:41:15PM -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> I suspect not, but I can't think of another example right now.
> >
> > There are a fair number that beat us to that punch (GPDB, HadoopDB,
> > etc.)
>
> Do they have parallel query on a single node? I suppose you can have
> multiple shards-per-node, but that's still a different feature.
I don't know of one offhand, but that distinction seems like a *VERY*
thin slice to be claiming.
> Also, are there other *SQL* implementations?
Yep. You can run SQL in parallel atop Hadoop.
Also: https://shardquery.com/2014/02/25/shard-query-supports-background-jobs-query-parallelism-and-all-select-syntax/
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
