Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism
Date
Msg-id 20160818001529.tpvrupsfe6gh5dvx@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-08-17 16:58:49 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > Could you also provide a strace -ttt -T -c and a cpu cycles flamegraph?
> 
> Here is the output from that strace invocation, plus a -p (to attach
> to the relevant backend):
> 
> strace: -t has no effect with -c
> strace: -T has no effect with -c

Ugh, swapped -c and -C, sorry.


> This doesn't seem that interesting, but not sure what you're looking for.

I'd like to know the amount of time spent in various syscalls, and how
much that varies.


> I also attach cycles flamegraph.

Thanks.

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: initdb: "'" for QUOTE_PATH (non-windows)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER, reform_and_rewrite_tuple(), and parallelism