Re: patch proposal - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: patch proposal
Date
Msg-id 20160817132722.GT4028@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch proposal  (Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: patch proposal  (Venkata B Nagothi <nag1010@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Venkata,

* Venkata B Nagothi (nag1010@gmail.com) wrote:
> Agreed. Additional option like "pause" would. As long as there is an option
> to ensure following happens if the recovery target is not reached -
>
>  a) PG pauses the recovery at the end of the WAL
>  b) Generates a warning in the log file saying that recovery target point
> is not reached (there is a patch being worked upon on by Thom on this)
>  c) Does not open-up the database exiting from the recovery process by
> giving room to resume the replay of WALs

One thing to consider is just how different this is from simply bringing
PG up as a warm standby instead, with the warning added to indicate if
the recovery point wasn't reached.

Thanks!

Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: EXLCUDE constraints and Hash indexes
Next
From: Ryan Murphy
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: initdb: "'" for QUOTE_PATH (non-windows)