Re: Slowness of extended protocol - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: Slowness of extended protocol
Date
Msg-id 20160809.075609.1857962255660550562.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Slowness of extended protocol  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> On the other hand, usage of some well-defined statement name to trigger
>> the special case would be fine: all pgbouncer versions would pass those
>> parse/bind/exec message as if it were regular messages.
> 
> I do not accept this idea that retroactively defining special semantics
> for certain statement names is not a protocol break.  If it causes any
> change in what the server's response would be, then it is a protocol
> break.

+1. It definitely is a protocol break.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: dsm_unpin_segment
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: dsm_unpin_segment