On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 02:07:18PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:57:35AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> On 8/2/16 12:51 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> > Yes, that's a strong argument for using a space. I have adjusted the
> >> > patch to use spaces in all reasonable places. Patch attached, which I
> >> > have gzipped because it was 133 KB. (Ah, see what I did there?) :-)
> >> >
> >> > I am thinking of leaving the 9.6 docs alone as I have already made them
> >> > consistent (no space) with minimal changes. We can make it consistent
> >> > the other way in PG 10.
> >>
> >> I don't think anyone wanted to *remove* the spaces in the documentation.
> >> I think this change makes the documentation harder to read.
> >
> > Well, we had spaces in only a few places in the docs, and as I said, it
> > is not consistent. Do you want those few put back for 9.6?
>
> +1 for that. I can't see how it's good for 10 to be one way, 9.6 to
> be the opposite way, and 9.5 and prior to be someplace in the middle.
> That seems like a back-patching mess.
OK, done.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
