Le Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:07:46 +0800,
Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru> a écrit :
> I am running PostgreSQL 9.5.
>
> CREATE TABLE t (id BIGINT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, name TEXT);
I guess this is not your definitive definition of the table and you might
have some other fields isn't it ?
I can see multiple way to change this schema that seems broken, but we probably
lack informations to pick the right one...
> The constraint that the data must satisfy is `there is no more than 3
> records with the same name`.
>
> I am not in control of queries that modify the table, so advisory locks
> can hardly be of help to me.
>
> On 06/22/2016 05:20 PM, Sameer Kumar wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:10 PM Vlad Arkhipov <arhipov@dc.baikal.ru
> > <mailto:arhipov@dc.baikal.ru>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a constraint that requires a table to be locked before checking
> > it (i.e. no more than 2 records with the same value in the same
> > column).
> > If I lock the table in the SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE mode, any vacuuming (or
> > autovacuuming) process prevents me from checking the constraint. What
> > are possible solutions?
> >
> >
> > May be you would like to share-
> > - Table Structure
> > - PostgreSQL version
> >
> > This will help people who would try to help you.
> >
> > I think you might want to consider an optimistic way of locking your
> > records, instead of locking them. Or look at advisory locks (but that
> > depends on your Postgres version).
