Re: 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Banck
Subject Re: 10.0
Date
Msg-id 20160513224446.GB29945@nighthawk.caipicrew.dd-dns.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10.0  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 05:31:00PM -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
> The underlying premise, for me, of choosing .4 or .5  was that presently we
> discontinue support after 5 years/releases.  A new .0 would come out just
> as we discontinue the previous .0

Well maybe the 5 year support cycle would be nice to encode, but how is
.0 different from .1 then?  You make sound like .0 would be similar to
Ubuntu's LTS which is not the case, unless you want to propose that only
.0 releases get 5 years and not the in-betweens? That'd be a shame.

Michael



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: Perf Benchmarking and regression.
Next
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0