Re: 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: 10.0
Date
Msg-id 20160513160534.GX10850@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 10.0  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: 10.0  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Dave Page (dpage@pgadmin.org) wrote:
> I imagine the bigger issue will be apps that have been written
> assuming the first part of the version number is only a single digit.

Let's just go with 2016 instead then.

At least then users would see how old the version they're running is (I
was just recently dealing with a 8.4 user...).

Thanks!

Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: 10.0