Re: Autovacuum of pg_database - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Autovacuum of pg_database
Date
Msg-id 20160506160547.GA212152@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autovacuum of pg_database  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Autovacuum of pg_database  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > These are all shared catalogs.  There are others, so you may still see
> > more.  We got another report for pg_database
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/A9D40BB7-CFD6-46AF-A0A1-249F04878A2A%40amazon.com
> > so I suppose there really is a bug.  I don't know what's going on there.
>
> I think it's pretty obvious: autovacuum.c's rule for detecting whether
> some other worker is already processing table X is wrong when X is a
> shared table.  I propose the attached patch.

Hmm, I have pretty much the same patch, except I added the flag to
struct autovac_table and have it populated by table_recheck_autovac.
Haven't tested this yet, which is why I hadn't posted it.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum of pg_database
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum of pg_database