Re: pg_upgrade and toasted pg_largeobject - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: pg_upgrade and toasted pg_largeobject
Date
Msg-id 20160503180900.GA59965@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade and toasted pg_largeobject  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade and toasted pg_largeobject  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> Any thoughts what to do with this?  We could decide that it's a bug fix
> and backpatch, or decide that it's a new feature and delay till 9.7,
> or decide that it's a minor bug fix and add it to 9.6 only.  I kinda lean
> towards the last alternative.

How about backpatching patch 1 all the way back, and putting the others
in 9.6?


-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Timeline following for logical slots
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Accidentally parallel unsafe functions