Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Date
Msg-id 20160428234013.GB11728@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 04:30:39PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-04-28 19:23:26 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > Are we going to rename pg_xlog or pg_clog for 9.6?
> 
> If we do so, we should do it at a good bit earlier in the cycle imo.

Well, we talked about it in May of 2015, but didn't do anything.  Was
there some big WAL user API change in this release that encouraged the
idea of the change?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade 9.6->9.6: column "amtype" does not exist