Re: parallel query vs extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: parallel query vs extensions
Date
Msg-id 20160419025623.GB1984253@tornado.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: parallel query vs extensions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:56:28AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Should every relevant contrib extension get a version bump with a
> > transition file which is nothing but a list of "alter function blah
> > blah blah parallel safe" ?
> 
> Yes, I think that's what we would need to do.  It's a lot of work,
> albeit mostly mechanical.

This is in the open items list, but I think it is too late to include such a
change in 9.6.  This is an opportunity for further optimization, not a defect.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add trigonometric functions that work in degrees.
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW