Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id 20160406.171612.81865787.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sorry, my code was wrong in the case that the total numer of
synchronous standby exceeds required number and the wansender is
at priority 1.

Sorry for the noise.

At Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:01:51 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote in
<20160406.170151.246853881.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> You must misread the patch. am_sync is originally set in the loop
> just after that for the case.

regards,


-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid archiving XLOG_RUNNING_XACTS on idle server