Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Abhijit Menon-Sen
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id 20160404085920.GA7426@toroid.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
List pgsql-hackers
At 2016-04-04 17:28:07 +0900, masao.fujii@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Barring any objections, I'll commit this patch.

No objections, just a minor wording tweak:

doc/src/sgml/config.sgml:

"The synchronous standbys will be the standbys that their names appear
early in this list" should be "The synchronous standbys will be those
whose names appear earlier in this list".

doc/src/sgml/high-availability.sgml:

"The standbys that their names appear early in this list are given
higher priority and will be considered as synchronous" should be "The
standbys whose names appear earlier in the list are given higher
priority and will be considered as synchronous".

"The standbys that their names appear early in the list will be used as
the synchronous standby" should be "The standbys whose names appear
earlier in the list will be used as synchronous standbys".

You may prefer to reword this in some other way, but the current "that
their names appear" wording should be changed.

-- Abhijit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2