Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster
Date
Msg-id 20160331191316.GA149775@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier wrote:

> Actually, the attached is better. This one relies on time() to perform
> the delay checks, and takes care of things even for slow machines.

Thanks, pushed with some minor adjustments.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: index-only scans with partial indexes
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Recovery test failure for recovery_min_apply_delay on hamster