Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6
Date
Msg-id 20160331181438.GA129524@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6
List pgsql-hackers
What led you to choose the ? operator for the FOLLOWED BY semantics?
It doesn't seem a terribly natural choice -- most other things seems to
use ? as some sort of wildcard.  What about something like "...", so you
would do SELECT q @@ to_tsquery('fatal ... error');
and  SELECT q @@ (tsquery 'fatal' ... tsquery 'error');

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Ivanov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: improving GROUP BY estimation