Re: snapshot too old, configured by time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: snapshot too old, configured by time
Date
Msg-id 20160331021915.GA84692@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: snapshot too old, configured by time  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: snapshot too old, configured by time  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier wrote:

> Just a note: I began looking at the tests, but finished looking at the
> patch entirely at the end by curiosity. Regarding the integration of
> this patch for 9.6, I think that bumping that to 9.7 would be wiser
> because the patch needs to be re-written largely, and that's never a
> good sign at this point of the development cycle.

Not rewritten surelY?  It will need a very large mechanical change to
existing BufferGetPage calls, but to me that doesn't equate "rewriting"
it.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Updated backup APIs for non-exclusive backups
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol