David Steele wrote:
> On 3/29/16 10:18 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >Repurposing COMMERROR is definitely starting to seem like a low-impact
> >solution compared to these others. Under what circumstances would you
> >be wanting hide-from-client with an elevel different from LOG, anyway?
>
> In pgaudit the log level for audit messages is user configurable but this
> was mostly added for testing purposes on the client side. I don't think it
> would be a big deal to force the level to LOG when client output is
> suppressed.
So audit records would use COMMERROR? That sounds really bad to me.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
