Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date
Msg-id 20160322182050.GA484357@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 9.6 -> 10.0  (Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Peter Geoghegan wrote:

> The question must be asked: What feature *would* meet that "major
> version bump" standard? If it's not extensive parallelism, then I
> don't know what else it could be.

Somebody mentioned partitioning.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Next
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0