Robert Haas wrote:
> Let's yank 'em. This is a minor issue which is distracting us from
> the main point of this patch, and I don't think it's worth getting
> distracted.
+1
> I'm pretty meh about the whole idea of this function, though,
> actually, and I don't see a single clear +1 vote for this
> functionality upthread. (Apologies if I've missed one.) In the
> absence of a few of those, I recommend we reject this.
+1
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services