Re: Odd warning from pg_dump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Odd warning from pg_dump |
Date | |
Msg-id | 20160308154518.GN3127@tamriel.snowman.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Odd warning from pg_dump (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: Odd warning from pg_dump
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > In connection with a question on -general, I tried this: > > $ pg_dump -n '*' regression >regression.dump > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "any" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "anyarray" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "anyelement" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "anyenum" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "anynonarray" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "anyrange" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "cstring" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "event_trigger" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "fdw_handler" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "index_am_handler" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "internal" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "language_handler" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "opaque" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "pg_ddl_command" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "record" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "trigger" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "tsm_handler" appears to be invalid > pg_dump: WARNING: typtype of data type "void" appears to be invalid > $ > > The datatypes being complained of are evidently all the pseudo-types. > I haven't looked into the code to figure out why this happens. > The dump is produced anyway, so it's only a cosmetic issue, but seems > probably worth fixing. This is fixed in my changes to pg_dump, though I didn't expect you'd be able to hit them in released versions and so hadn't been planning to break it out. This is the hunk for that particular change (line numbers are probably off due to my other changes in the overall patch): *************** dumpType(Archive *fout, TypeInfo *tyinfo *** 8722,8727 **** --- 8727,8743 ---- dumpRangeType(fout, tyinfo); else if (tyinfo->typtype == TYPTYPE_PSEUDO && !tyinfo->isDefined) dumpUndefinedType(fout, tyinfo); + else if (tyinfo->typtype == TYPTYPE_PSEUDO && tyinfo->isDefined && + strncmp(tyinfo->dobj.namespace->dobj.name, "pg_catalog", 10) == 0) + /* + * skip defined pseudo-types in pg_catalog, they are special cases in + * the type system which are defined at initdb time only. + * + * Should a user manage to create one (which would require hand hacking + * the catalog, currently), throwing the below error seems entirely + * reasonable. + */ + return; else write_msg(NULL, "WARNING: typtype of data type \"%s\" appears to be invalid\n", tyinfo->dobj.name); I can certainly look at committing that independently from the other pg_dump changes that I'm working on. Thanks! Stephen
pgsql-hackers by date: