On 2016-02-19 10:14:47 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We have already hesitated to record DDL changes for
> logical replication because of the code size, maintenance overhead, and
> testing required.
I'm not sure what you're referring to here? It'd be some relatively
minor code surgery to also pass catalog changes to output plugins. It's
just questionable what'd that bring to the table.
Andres
