On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:54:17PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Understood. My point is that there is a short list of read events, and
> > many DDL events. We have already hesitated to record DDL changes for
> > logical replication because of the code size, maintenance overhead, and
> > testing required.
>
> DDL is already captured using the event triggers mechanism (which is
> what it was invented for in the first place). The only thing we don't
> have is a hardcoded mechanism to transform it from C struct format to
> SQL language.
Right, which is I think were the maintenance/testing overhead will come
from, which we are trying to avoid. Having logical replication and
auditing share that burden would be a win.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +
