On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:02:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Still, it seems clear that the bulk of the shutdown time is indeed the
> stats collector taking its time about shutting down, which is doubly
> weird because the ecpg tests shouldn't have created very many tables,
> so why would there be a lot of data to write? Even granting that it's
> not writing to ramdisk, 57 seconds to shut down seems pretty excessive.
>
> I wonder if it's worth sticking some instrumentation into stats
> collector shutdown?
I wouldn't be surprised if the collector got backlogged during the main phase
of testing and took awhile to chew through its message queue before even
starting the write of the final stats.
