Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
Date
Msg-id 20160206174146.GB21037@awork2.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2016-02-06 17:43:48 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >Still the data is here... But well. I won't insist.
> 
> Huh? This thread started by an example how to cause loss of committed
> transactions. That fits my definition of "data loss" quite well.

Agreed, that view doesn't seem to make much sense. This clearly is a
data loss issue.

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: make NOTIFY list de-duplication optional
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Explanation for bug #13908: hash joins are badly broken