Re: [SQL] Q: documentation bug ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Karsten Hilbert
Subject Re: [SQL] Q: documentation bug ?
Date
Msg-id 20160204110532.GG22591@hermes.hilbert.loc
Whole thread Raw
In response to [SQL] Q: documentation bug ?  (Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [SQL] Q: documentation bug ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 12:00:45PM +0100, Vik Fearing wrote:

>>     REINDEX [ ( { VERBOSE } [, ...] ) ] { INDEX | TABLE | SCHEMA | DATABASE | SYSTEM } name
...
>> Does this constitute a bug in the documentation or in the Debian version of PG ?
>
> Neither.  It's a little bit obscure because {} and [] mean special
> things, but () doesn't.

Eagle-eyed !

>  The syntax is therefore:
>
>     REINDEX (VERBOSE) DATABASE gnumed_v21;

Thank you !  :-)

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Karsten Hilbert
Date:
Subject: [SQL] Q: documentation bug ?
Next
From: Heine Ferreira
Date:
Subject: workarounds for ci_text