Hi,
On 2016-01-27 15:49:22 +0100, otheus uibk wrote:
> What a doozie! Documenting such a requirement in such a fashion (at the end
> of of a section) is a golden example of obfuscation and
> cryptodocumentation. Perhaps someone with wisdom will see fit to move the
> relevant paragraph to the top of the "Configuration parameters" section,
> instead of at the end.
Meh. It used to be general requirement to add extension prefixes to
custom_variable_classes, it wasn't pg_stat_statement specific. And it's
a short paragraph.
But either way, 9.1 is soon to be EOLed, I don't see much point in
working on its docs.
Andres
