Vitaly Burovoy wrote:
> I guess you are talking about the other thread[1].
> I'm not sure I have enough experience in Postgres hacking to start
> working on it right now, but I'll have a look.
> IMO the best way is to raise that topic by a letter with summary what
> troubles are left there (in addition to a rebasing one).
>
>
> [1] http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20110707213401.GA27098@alvh.no-ip.org
Here's a newer thread:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1343682669-sup-2532%40alvh.no-ip.org
which includes some points needing additional work.
In my local tree I have a branch that maybe is not the same as the last
patch I posted in that thread, because the last commit has a newer date.
Here I attach what that branch has. It applies cleanly on top of
03bda4535ee119d3. I don't remember if it was in compilable state at the
time I abandoned it.
It needs some work to rebase, but from a quick experimental "git merge"
I just ran, it's not too bad.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
