Re: commit 5c45d2f need to be back-patch on branch 9.2 & before - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: commit 5c45d2f need to be back-patch on branch 9.2 & before
Date
Msg-id 20151229114226.x33xobhuve443w6i@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to commit 5c45d2f need to be back-patch on branch 9.2 & before  (amul sul <sul_amul@yahoo.co.in>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2015-12-29 11:22:52 +0000, amul sul wrote:
> Uninitialized variable 'dtype' warning in date_in() is fix[1] on branch 9.3 & above, but not for 9.2 & older
branches.I guess this should be back-patch. 
 
> [1] commit link=> http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/5c45d2f87835ccd3ffac338845ec79cab1b31a11

We don't routinely backpatch warnings. Often enough the benefit is not
worth the risk. In this case I'd possibly gone the other way, but given
it's a low frequency warning in old branches I'm not inclined to do so
today.

Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: amul sul
Date:
Subject: commit 5c45d2f need to be back-patch on branch 9.2 & before
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_controldata/pg_resetxlog "Latest checkpoint's NextXID" format