Re: BDR - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andreas Kretschmer
Subject Re: BDR
Date
Msg-id 20151215084954.GA13983@tux
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BDR  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Responses Re: BDR
List pgsql-general
John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:

> On 12/15/2015 12:01 AM, Andreas Kretschmer wrote:
>> I would like to play with BDR, can i use my 9.5 / 9.6 installation
>> (first attempt fails) or do i have to use 9.4 stable?
>
> 9.5 is a in-development version, 9.6 doesn't even exist, why would you
> want to use anything OTHER than the stable and reliable 9.4 unless
> you're explicitly testing for bugs in 9.5 ?

playing with new features. (9.6 exists as devel, with great features
like parallel seq. scan)

>
> BDR is currently an addon for 9.4, I don't believe its available for 9.5
> yet.

apparently, thx for the answer.


Regards, Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect.                              (Linus Torvalds)
"If I was god, I would recompile penguin with --enable-fly."   (unknown)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe.              N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Jov
Date:
Subject: wal receiver process always start after startup process recovering all WALs and need new WAL?
Next
From: Daniel Westermann
Date:
Subject: pg_dump executed on a hosts against another host fails with pg_dump: [archiver (db)] query was: SET search_path = pg_catalog, sys, dbo