Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby
Date
Msg-id 20151211173456.GS2763@alvherre.pgsql
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [DOCS] max_worker_processes on the standby  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Not sure what is going on; my reading of the code certainly says that
> the data should be there.  I'm looking into it.
>
> I also noticed that I didn't actually push the whole of the patch
> yesterday -- I neglected to "git add" the latest changes, the ones that
> fix the promotion scenario :-( so the commit messages is misleading
> because it describes something that's not there.

Pushed a fix.

I also wrote some tests using the RecoveryNode stuff submitted by
Michael Paquier.  These aren't yet pushed, because we don't have the
framework; once we have that I can push them too.  As far as I can tell,
these tests exercise all the cases that have been pointed out so far; I
can see some of them fail if I run on previous commits.

Thanks for the continued testing.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should TIDs be typbyval = FLOAT8PASSBYVAL to speed up CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY?
Next
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: fix lock contention for HASHHDR.mutex